Gov 2.0 - danah boyd
Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:49PM
Social Media,
danah boyd,
transparency in
Community,
Social Media,
Technology
Thursday, April 8, 2010 at 9:51AM I love Twitter. There I said it. It is an easy way for me to engage with other people from around the world and get knowledge fast. From a business prescriptive, it a great way to interact with the community I work with. But, a lot of companies are only harnessing a portion of Twitter's power. How is this possible when they are present on twitter? It is because they aren't using the tool properly
I have been noticing the upswing in organisations on Twitter, which is great! Sadly, all they are using it for is one way communication. They are using it like TV. The TV takes the view of one person (the producer or corporation) and presents their results to many (the viewers). Twitter has the capabilities of being more like email. Where you can send you message to one person OR you can send it to many and converse with them. In the public domain.
It isn't enough to just post about your newest press release or upcoming events or items you want people to act on. You need to engage with your audience. You need to talk to them and have a personality. That is what is so great about these brands:
Comcast
Southwest Airlines
American Express*
But, we only have fill in the number of staff. Yes, and so? This changes the situation how? You need to have someone working on PR, this should be their responsibility or get the help of a volunteer. If you want to cultivate lifetime members and people that can't live without your product, you need to engage with them or someone else is going to. It is a simple step, but one that is often ignored because it takes sometime. With the right twitter client, search terms, and a dedicated person it is an easy way to create dedicated members.
*in full disclosure, one of the programs I run for my organization is funded by a grant from American Express.
Friday, March 19, 2010 at 11:04AM A few days ago I wrote a post about community management, as it turns out, Nestlé needs a few points in this area. Earlier today they issued a statement on their Facebook wall that is causing a revolt of some of the brands most loyal users.
Social Media Today is reporting that is started with:
Greenpeace is attacking Nestlé for its “unsustainable palm oil” policy. No news there. They’ve even released a scathing attack ad about Kit Kat in recent days entitled “Need a break? So does the rainforest?” Meanwhile, perhaps in response, the company’s Facebook minders this morning issued a killjoy edict to its 90,000-plus fan base that says anybody showing their loyalty to the brand by using the logo will be, ominously, “deleted.”
I am not saying Greenpeace is in the right or the wrong here, but Nestlé is not handling the backlash correctly. They need to forget about trademark issues on their logo and deal with the issue at hand. They also need a new manager for their fan page. I would never put (or allow) the following statement up on the fan pages I manage:
They are bleeding. At a very fast rate too. An appropriate response is needed from the company before this will stop. I highly suggest they stop deleting comments, if they don't they are just going to dig themselves a deeper grave.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010 at 12:16AM Day 4 was our final day in Austin. As I write this, we are on a plane back to DCA. I must say, I am happy to get back home to my city. I miss it. We've been reading stories of the flooding and Old Town and are anxious to see how bad it actually is. Fingers crossed.
I think I gained the most the Community Management panel, which happened to be the last one I attended. The panel was made up of various community managers with a variety of viewpoints. From the beginning, two of the managers said they were going to disagree with each other and they did! I loved it. What they showed is that there are several ways to determine success. One viewed success through pure statistical numbers and the other through impressions made.
A main point from the panel was, unlike what most companies are doing, your community managers should be a senior level person. Why? This person needs to understand your business plan, the goals, and how to generate new business. A person fresh out of college, or an intern, doesn't have this experience or knowhow to achieve this. At first, this idea kind of surprised me. As the panelist began to describe what they expect out of themselves as managers, I began to see the points at which a inexperienced person would be weak. Even worse, I started looking back at how weak I was as a manager when I first started. I had an MPA but schooling didn't teach me how to manage groups or the company's strategy.
The panel suffered somewhat from the audiences questions. The audience kept coming back to how do you develop a community. To which, one panelist shouted back "you have a database, use it". It was hysterical, but you had to be there. We had to go back to the community tells you when you have a community, you can't force it on them. I wish more people would continue to reiterate this point. You can't force the idea of community on people, it doesn't matter how much you try.
Lastly from the community panel, we heard more and more about organizations that just aren't ready to face the world that is here. Too many execs are trying to shutdown online communities that they feel shouldn't be out there or were created outside of their "walls". What these companies are missing is the community mindset. They should be embracing all communities and using great customer service principles to develop these customers.
Update:
We made it back home and everything survived the DC rains. We flew over Old Town and it looks like all the water is gone. The cats are excited we are back and Mr Darcy(one of our cats) has tried to tweet for me a few times tonight.
Thanks for joining us on our SXSW journey this year!
Austin,
SXSW,
Social Media in
Social Media
Monday, March 15, 2010 at 11:16PM Time is flying down here in Austin. I have really enjoyed some panels, and others are just average. In talking to a few other attendees, we are noticing a level drop in the panels. They are catering to more of the lower level attendees. One of the reasons that I loved this conference is it made me think; I enjoyed going to things that are over my head. Attending panels like that pushed me. This year, it hasn't been that way. There have been three new sessions that I have enjoyed in days 2 & 3 based on their presenters. The first is the danah boyd keynote, the Clay Shirky presentation, and the WomenWhoTech discussion.
You can read danah's entire presentation on her site so I am not going to rehash it for you. What I got from it is, as your nonprofit is wanting to develop its own social networking platform, you should take into consideration privacy. I can think of several organizations that DO NOT have opt-out features. The consultant's that they have hired have convinced them that they do not need them. (Do not hire a consultant that does not understand privacy rights please. Please, for me, just don't do it.)
Some of you may remember my last post on Clay Shirky when he spoke at another event I was at. Clay impressed his audience by wearing a three wolf moon shirt, which he did reference in his presentation. The main idea I got out of his presentation was: "Find the person with the big ideas in your organization, lock them out of the building, and then tell them to come back when they have 10 medium ideas and lots of small ideas. The organization can't just have one great idea, it needs lots of different sized ones to survive. Once you have tried out the ideas, take the ideas and stuff that works go public about the successes. " I hope more places will start to think like this!
The last panel I want to talk about is the WomenWhoTech session which was awesome. The women on the panel shared some of their experiences and then led the audience in a discussion. The big point that stuck with me is you don't have to be a "expert" at everything. One panelist said that instead of trying to be that "expert" you should: "...view it as 'this is what I am passionate about and my goal is to embrace it and get better. It is your craft and you're am getting better at it everyday'". I really liked her point there. We tend to, as women, try to be perfect and then beat ourselves up for not being. I know I do that all the time. To turn that into a positive, own how you are now and improve upon that.
The last thing about that panel that rocked is there were men that attended. One gentleman spoke up and said that he works as an image consultant and mostly with women. For him, it was extremely enlightening to hear what women in tech are going through. We must give props to the few males in the room; especially those that contributed to the conversation.
The days here in Austin are all running together and being posted somewhat out of order. Joel and I are starting to pack up tonight as we head back to DC in the morning. I will hopefully get to write about today's events in more detail while we are traveling. For something else to read, you can check out the reference to my husband in the Huffington Post!
Austin,
SXSW,
Social Media in
Social Media Disclaimer: This is a personal blog. The opinions expressed on these pages are mine alone and not that of my employer.